How Visa and Mastercard Came to Dominate the Global Credit Card Market
Overview
- Visa and Mastercard's nearly absolute market power resulted from strategic legal actions, aggressive business tactics, and deliberate industry manipulation, which effectively suppressed competition.
- Their control over the vast payment network creates formidable barriers for any new entrants, ensuring their duopoly remains unchallenged and dominant.
- Through years of legal victories, strategic alliances, and market manipulation, they have entrenched their position, making fair competition increasingly impossible worldwide.
The Origins of Monopoly Power in the 1960s United States
It’s startling to realize that the roots of Visa and Mastercard’s dominance stretch back more than half a century in the United States. These giants weren't born solely from market demand but were meticulously created through deliberate industry strategies by major banks eager to monopolize electronic payments. Take Visa, for instance; it emerged from Bank of America's strategic move in the late 1960s, deliberately spinning off a payment network that would serve as a powerful industry lever. Similarly, Mastercard originated from a coalition called the Interbank Card Association, which was formed with the explicit goal of controlling market share. These entities employed aggressive tactics—using exclusive contracts, legal battles, and strategic alliances—to crush competitors like American Express. They imposed contractual restrictions that made it nearly impossible for rivals to expand or even survive, effectively creating a duopoly that, outside China, claims nearly 90% of the global market today. Their early success was not accidental but a carefully orchestrated process of strategic consolidation and legal maneuvering that cemented their dominance for decades.
Legal Battles and Business Tactics that Cemented Control
How did they sustain their monopolistic grip over such an extended period? The answer involves a sophisticated blend of legal warfare and business practices designed to suppress any real competition. For example, the giants launched multiple lawsuits against American Express, resulting in court rulings that barred exclusive merchant and banking agreements. These legal victories—like the landmark case winning over American Express—enabled Visa and Mastercard to extend their influence and lock competitors out of crucial market segments. Moreover, they used exclusive contracts that limited banks and merchants to only accept their cards, further entrenching their dominance. These tactics weren’t just about market share—they created a sealed ecosystem where every new entrant faced insurmountable legal and contractual hurdles. Their ability to harness legal systems as tools of suppression exemplifies how strategic litigation and contractual leverage can be wielded to maintain monopolistic control for decades.
Today’s Market Power and Its Pervasive Impact
Today, the influence of Visa and Mastercard is more entrenched than ever, and their control over the payment infrastructure continues to grow. They generate enormous profits from transaction fees, which are passed on—often invisibly—to consumers and merchants. For instance, even dominant corporations like Amazon struggle to avoid their networks; recent actions like Amazon’s decision to halt Visa transactions in the UK perfectly illustrate the ongoing power struggle. Furthermore, the burgeoning fintech industry—such as PayPal, Block, and Klarna—aims to provide alternative digital wallets and direct bank transfer methods, but they face an almost insurmountable challenge: the existing duopoly’s extensive network and contractual influence effectively block genuine competition. Astonishingly, these two companies now control about 90% of the global market outside China, a testament to decades of strategic market manipulation, legal victories, and alliance-building. Their continued dominance stifles innovation, keeps transaction costs high, and leaves less room for emerging competitors with fresh ideas. The sheer scale of their network influence has created a payment landscape where fair competition is not just discouraged but practically impossible, ensuring their empire remains largely unassailable.
References
Loading...