Indonesian Military Starts Making Low-Cost Medicines and Fears of Returning to Authoritarian Rule
Overview
- - The military’s new role in medicine signals a disturbing trend toward renewed authoritarian influence.
- - Critics warn that this move threatens to expand military dominance into civilian life, reminiscent of Indonesia’s dark past under Suharto.
- - Historical patterns suggest that such initiatives often serve as stepping stones toward the re-establishment of authoritarian control, risking democracy’s fragile progress.
Unveiling the True Intent: More Than Just Healthcare
Indonesia’s plan to produce affordable medicines for rural areas initially appears commendable, showcasing efforts to improve healthcare. However, beneath the surface, many experts see a carefully orchestrated effort that is anything but purely altruistic. This initiative echoes tactics used during the Suharto era, where military leaders embedded themselves deeply into civilian sectors—controlling banking, media, and industry—thus consolidating power and limiting democratic space. Critics argue that this move is yet another strategic attempt to deepen military influence, dressed up as a kindness to the underserved. If we consider history’s lessons, similar moves have historically been the first step toward authoritarian resurgence, where military dominance begins to overshadow civilian authority. The danger here is real—activating memories of a time when the military held sway over every facet of Indonesian life, and freedoms were severely curtailed.
Echoes of the Past: The Persistent Threat of Military Overreach
Taking a close look at Indonesia’s history reveals a recurring pattern: whenever the military actively involves itself in civilian affairs, the doors to authoritarianism tend to swing wide open. During Suharto’s rule, the armed forces monopolized influential sectors, from banking to broadcasting, leaving the democratic institutions weakened and fragile. Today, critics emphasize that similar moves—such as state-controlled medicine—are more than just a health initiative; they are a calculated step toward reaffirming military authority. Moreover, there are chilling parallels with countries like Myanmar or Egypt, where military interference in governance swiftly led to oppressive regimes that suppressed dissent and restricted basic liberties. These examples serve as stark warnings, illustrating that Indonesia’s current path could be dangerously leading it back into an era where civilian voices are drowned out and military influence is normalized, thereby threatening to undo decades of democratic progress.
The Stakes Are High: What Could This Mean for Indonesia’s Democracy?
Many analysts and human rights advocates express deep concern, noting that Indonesian law explicitly prohibits active soldiers from engaging in civilian commercial enterprises. Yet, this initiative appears to quietly erode those legal boundaries, acting almost as a Trojan horse designed to gradually sneak military influence into civilian sectors. Such actions are highly significant because, historically, when the military begins controlling core aspects of civilian life, the foundations of democracy weaken—dissent is stifled, civil liberties shrink, and authoritarian rule takes root. The case of Prabowo Subianto, a former military general with a history tied to authoritarian methods, only heightens these fears. This isn’t merely about providing medicines; it’s about the potential reassertion of military dominance at the expense of democracy. If Indonesia truly wants to preserve its hard-won freedoms, it must be vigilant against moves that, although framed as progress, could secretly pave the way for the re-emergence of authoritarian rule—a future that must be averted at all costs.
References
Loading...