Across various countries such as Pakistan, the UK, and Germany, recent studies have consistently demonstrated that students who excessively depend on ChatGPT often experience declines in both their academic grades and intrinsic motivation. For example, in Pakistani universities, researchers observed that students who overuse AI tend to feel less enthusiastic and more disengaged, as if their natural curiosity has been dampened. Similarly, in the UK, students report that reliance on AI sometimes replaces active learning, causing a decrease in critical thinking skills. This dependence is akin to taking shortcuts in a complex maze—initially appealing, but ultimately leading to entrapment in patterns of complacency and reduced effort. The long-term consequence is a diminished capacity to face academic challenges confidently, which can have serious repercussions for future success.
Digging deeper, the research uncovers that personality traits play a pivotal role in how students interact with ChatGPT. Students with high conscientiousness—those who are diligent, responsible, and highly organized—tend to avoid overdependence, viewing AI as a supplementary resource rather than a crutch. For instance, such students might use ChatGPT to clarify concepts or brainstorm, but they rely mainly on their own efforts for assignments. Conversely, students exhibiting traits like neuroticism or high openness often explore AI tools impulsively, seeking novelty or relief from anxiety—yet this can backfire. In one Pakistani study, responsible students prioritized thorough research, critical analysis, and independent problem-solving over superficial shortcuts, underscoring that strong personal discipline acts as a buffer against AI overuse. Therefore, understanding these personality differences is key to designing interventions that promote healthy AI usage.
Perhaps most alarmingly, the data clearly show that excessive reliance on ChatGPT can quietly sap students' self-esteem and自主性—their ability to learn independently and confidently. Consider a student who begins to believe they can only succeed when assisted by AI; over time, this reliance fosters a sense of helplessness and reduces motivation to engage in challenging tasks. For example, students who perceive the grading system as unfair or opaque tend to lean heavily on AI to 'game' the system, but paradoxically, this dependency makes them feel less capable of genuine achievement. Consequently, their grades may decline, and their self-efficacy diminishes further, creating a damaging cycle. The key takeaway is that overdependence trains students to abdicate responsibility for their learning, risking their ability to adapt and overcome future academic hurdles. Recognizing these risks is crucial for educators and students alike, emphasizing the importance of nurturing自主性 while responsibly integrating AI into learning.
Loading...