In Uganda, the Special Forces Command (SFC) stands out as not merely a military unit; it is the clandestine engine that propels President Museveni’s unwavering rule. This formidable force, meticulously trained and heavily armed, has become an extension of the president’s will—an unmistakable symbol of his deep entrenchment in power. For example, reports detail how the SFC has been used to silence opposition figures, conduct covert surveillance, and even carry out targeted assassinations—activities that reveal the alarming transformation of the military into a personal enforcer for the regime. Such instances underscore how the military’s loyalty has shifted from national service to personal loyalty, ultimately challenging Uganda’s sovereignty and democratic integrity.
What makes the SFC particularly striking is how it has evolved into a parallel political authority, often bypassing civilian oversight entirely. With over 10,000 elite operatives led by Museveni’s son, Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the unit wields influence that rivals or even surpasses the legitimate government institutions. For instance, credible sources suggest that the SFC has engaged in border incursions into neighboring countries to detain rivals or influence regional politics—actions reminiscent of rogue military factions in fragile states. This dual military structure fosters a dangerous environment where personal loyalty, reinforced through familial ties and military strength, threatens to undermine Uganda’s sovereignty, leaving the nation vulnerable to internal chaos and external manipulation.
The unchecked power of the SFC presents not only immediate risks but also long-term threats to Uganda’s democracy and stability. Museveni’s use of this elite force to manipulate elections, intimidate rivals, and entrench his family’s control, including appointing his wife as education minister and positioning his grandson in the military, signifies a shift toward a de facto military dictatorship. Such consolidation of power could have dire consequences—potentially leading to authoritarian collapse or civil unrest. Historical examples across Africa and beyond clearly demonstrate that when the military becomes a tool for personal rule, democratic institutions weaken, and stability becomes fragile. Without meaningful reforms, Uganda risks becoming another case study of military rule eroding freedom and perpetuating cycles of violence.
Loading...